For generations, people have tried to decode women’s bodies as if they were puzzles hiding secret meanings—fertility clues, moral judgments, sexual histories, even personality traits. The myths get passed around casually, repeated like they’re facts, until they harden into cultural assumptions that follow women through adolescence, relationships, motherhood, and aging. But the truth is straightforward: the body doesn’t work the way these rumors claim, and pretending otherwise only fuels shame, insecurity, and ignorance.
Take the obsession with breast size. Whole industries and social narratives have been built around this one body feature, assigning it meanings it never had. A woman’s cup size doesn’t tell you anything about her fertility, her health, her libido, or her “experience.” Fertility is governed by hormones, ovulation cycles, egg quality, the reproductive system, genetics, and lifestyle. Breast tissue plays no role in any of that. It’s fat, glandular tissue, ducts, and nerves—nothing more mysterious than that. Big breasts don’t signal stronger fertility, and small breasts don’t signal weaker fertility. The myth persists because people conflate appearance with biology, and biology doesn’t care about human assumptions.
The same goes for another popular superstition—the idea that vaginal “tightness” reveals something about a woman’s sexual history. It’s a belief built on misinformation and insecurity, not reality. Vaginal tone is influenced by genetics, age, hormones, pelvic floor strength, childbirth, health conditions, and even stress. Muscles tighten, relax, weaken, strengthen—just like any other muscle group in the body. They do not permanently change based on the number of sexual encounters a woman has. Bodies are not scorecards. They don’t keep moral tallies, and they don’t reveal private histories to anyone who thinks they know how to interpret them.
Continue reading next page…