The ongoing debate over how to investigate the events of January 6 continues to spark division in Washington—this time, within the Republican Party itself. At the center of the disagreement are House Speaker Mike Johnson and Representative Barry Loudermilk of Georgia, both prominent GOP lawmakers with sharply different views on how the Republican-led inquiry should proceed.
While both men agree that the original Democratic-led investigation carried political overtones, they now diverge on how to frame the next steps. Representative Loudermilk has called for a comprehensive review, including an examination of Capitol security procedures, leadership decisions, and emergency response failures. Speaker Johnson, by contrast, appears to support a more focused approach—one that steers clear of politically sensitive issues and avoids reopening internal party rifts.
What might seem like a procedural debate is, in reality, part of a broader discussion about how the events of that day should be remembered and understood by the American public.
Continue reading on next page…