The situation has led to a range of reactions, both within the wrestling community and beyond. Some applaud Johnston’s commitment to his values, calling it a brave stand in today’s competitive sports world. Others raise concerns about the message it might send regarding gender and equality in athletics.
Critics argue that opting out of matches based on an opponent’s gender could create divisions and discourage inclusivity. Supporters counter that athletes should be allowed to act in accordance with their personal or religious beliefs, even when it comes with consequences.
Johnston’s choice highlights the ongoing conversation around how sports, faith, and evolving societal norms intersect. While his time on the wrestling mat may have ended, the discussions his actions sparked are likely to continue.
In the end, his story serves as a reminder of the importance of balancing personal values with the shared goals of fairness, respect, and opportunity in sports.