Among the materials under review are photographs and procedural filings. Some of the exhibits include images of the victims—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—as well as their surviving roommates, Bethany Funke and Dylan Mortensen. These photos were shown during Kohberger’s sentencing hearing but have never been released outside of the courtroom. It remains unclear which of these images, if any, will ultimately be made public.
Other documents in the batch address trial procedures, such as which evidence was admissible, what witnesses could testify, and rulings on defense strategies. Many filings also explain why certain records were sealed during the trial, offering insight into the court’s decision-making process.
Judge Hippler has said the review will begin with the most recent records and work backward, suggesting the unsealing could take several months. The oldest file currently under review dates back to June 2.
The potential release has sparked discussion about the role of transparency in the justice system. Supporters argue that public access to records fosters accountability and helps citizens better understand how courts operate. Legal experts also note that these documents could serve as valuable case studies for students of law and criminology.
At the same time, there are concerns about the sensitivity of certain materials. Families of the victims, as well as privacy advocates, have cautioned against releasing content that could cause further distress. Courts are expected to weigh these factors carefully as the process continues.
The Kohberger case has drawn national and international interest since the November 2022 tragedy in Moscow, Idaho. Initially set for trial this year, proceedings were altered when Kohberger accepted a plea agreement, leading directly to his sentencing. The outcome shifted the focus from jury deliberations to sentencing, leaving many questions about the case’s behind-the-scenes details.
As more documents are reviewed, news outlets and the public are expected to follow the developments closely. Each decision will contribute to ongoing discussions about how high-profile cases should be handled, the importance of public access, and the ethical responsibility to protect those most directly affected.
Ultimately, the unsealing process highlights the complexities of the justice system—balancing openness with compassion. Judge Hippler’s careful approach suggests that while the public may gain greater insight into the case, it will be done gradually and with close consideration for privacy and respect.