In recent weeks, lawmakers and former officials have raised questions about the use of the presidential autopen during the final stretch of President Joe Biden’s term. The device, traditionally used to sign non-urgent or routine documents, has now become the center of a larger discussion about executive process and transparency.
Concerns were voiced by several Republican figures, including former administration officials, who questioned whether the autopen was used appropriately in authorizing key actions—ranging from regulatory decisions to official pardons. While the autopen is a legally recognized tool that has been used by past presidents, critics argue that its use should be limited to lower-priority paperwork and not significant executive decisions.
One area drawing attention is the signing of recent documents affecting cryptocurrency policy. Some political commentators, including former Trump advisor David Sacks, suggested that certain officials, such as Senator Elizabeth Warren, may have played an outsized role in shaping crypto-related decisions. These claims stem from Warren’s previously stated positions on regulating digital finance platforms, though no formal evidence has surfaced linking her directly to the use of the autopen.
Continue reading on next page…